Built on what won. Sharpened by what didn't.

Win Canadian grants using patterns from funded proposals.

Write your CCSIF proposal with AI grounded in three things at once: NSERC's official evaluation criteria, real funded applications, and the mistakes that got others rejected. Every section is scored as you write, then exported as an NSERC-formatted PDF for the Convergence Portal.

Three steps from idea to submission.

Start writing immediately

Pick your grant program (CCSIF template built in). AI drafts each section using patterns from winning grants. No profile setup required to get started.

Score & improve with AI

A 0–100 completeness score tells you how specific each section is. Competitiveness compares your writing to funded versus rejected proposals. Rewrite until every section is strong.

Formatted for Convergence Portal

Download properly formatted PDFs matching CCSIF Convergence standards: 11 pt Arial, letter size, correct headers. Ready to submit as-is.

How it was built

Grounded in three sources of truth, not generic AI.

Most AI writes grant-speak from thin air. CanGrant was built on real evidence: the funder's rulebook, the proposals that won, and the ones that lost. Every draft and every score obeys all three at once.

01

The rulebook

The funder's own instructions

NSERC's official CCSIF evaluation criteria and formatting rules, taken verbatim from their published guidance — exactly what reviewers score on, what disqualifies you, every page limit and EDI requirement. The AI follows this first, always.

02

What won

Real funded proposals

Real funded CCSIF applications, distilled into concrete patterns — numbered aims, named methodologies, living-wage citations, quantified partner contributions. The AI writes in the structure and language of grants that actually got funded.

03

What didn't

Lessons from rejected grants

Real rejected proposals and the reviewers' written feedback, distilled into the exact failure modes that sank them — vague EDI, deferred impact measures, unfocused scope. The AI actively steers around every one.

Winners show it the target. Losers show it the landmines. The funder's instructions are the ground truth. That is the whole idea behind Built on what won. Sharpened by what didn't.

Built on 4 funded CCSIF grants.

Every AI call, every score, and every suggestion is grounded in what actually won CCSIF funding. Here is a sample of the patterns the tool checks for:

Numbered specific aims (3–4, action verbs)
Local data/statistics cited with source
Named methodology (service learning, design thinking)
Phased work plan (Year 1/2/3 with lettered activities)
60–70% of budget to direct delivery
Living wage cited with source
Partner roles explicit with named contacts
Knowledge dissemination in every year
Track record proven with specific numbers
EDI with concrete actions (GBA+, diversity champions)
Curriculum integration for sustainability
Multiple evaluation methods (4–5)

Ready to win your next grant?